The post was inspired by a footnote written by a Judge in a special education case. ?He said in?K.O. v. New York City Department of Education?60 IDELR 102, n.1 (SDNY 01/26/2012):?"?Unfortunately, '[t]his opinion, dealing as it does with the IDEA and practices thereunder, is replete with acronyms.'?M.H. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ. (M.H. II),?685 F.3d 217, 223 n.l (2d Cir. 2012). One suspects that?regulators and bureaucrats?love such jargon because it makes even simple matters cognizable only to the cognoscenti and thus?enhances their power?at the expense of people who only know English. Nevertheless, acronyms have so invaded IDEA practice that this judge, like others before him, is pretty much stuck with having to use them." ??
You can see the entire post here.
The responses generally agree that we overuse acronyms. ?Where the disagreement occurs is the question of whether this is an ethical issue. ?I'd be interested in your thoughts. ?This issue may have some traction!
Source: http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/acronyms-special-education-ethical.html
san francisco 49ers stan musial Mega 49ers lance armstrong ufc Earl Weaver
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.